Client notes / After handover

The work, in the client's words.

Client accounts of the decisions, site conditions, and working relationships that shaped the finished building.

What matters afterward

Praise is easy to collect. A useful account explains what happened when the work became difficult.

A finished photograph shows the result, but not the decisions required to reach it. The notes below place each client’s words beside the concern that brought KMG into the room.

Each record follows the same practical line: what was at risk, how the team responded, and what remained when the building was handed over.

01 / Client account

Bethesda, Maryland

Mixed-use residential

Architecture + enclosure coordination

Wisconsin Avenue Residences

“We had one tower, several consultants, and decisions arriving from every direction. Kristofer kept the architecture, enclosure, and construction questions in the same conversation. KMG did not make the work feel simple. They made it understandable.”
Maya ChenDevelopment director

Completed residential tower seen through mature trees — The completed tower from Wisconsin Avenue

Rooftop pool terrace surrounded by the completed residential building — Roof terrace after enclosure and waterproofing coordination

01 / Concern: Facade decisions were arriving late while rooftop amenities, waterproofing, and enclosure transitions were still moving through separate consultant packages.
02 / Response: KMG kept a single decision register, reviewed full-scale mockups, and brought unresolved interfaces into direct site conversations before finishes concealed them.
03 / After handover: The building opened with the major enclosure questions closed, a clear record for facilities staff, and fewer unresolved items at turnover.

02 / Client account

Los Angeles, California

Historic community building

Existing structure + masonry conservation

Union Avenue Community Hall

“The building mattered to people long before we began the work. KMG understood that repair was not an excuse to erase what was difficult. Kristofer showed us what had to remain, what had to be strengthened, and where a new intervention could stay quiet.”
Rafael OrtizBoard chair

Historic red-brick community building around an enclosed courtyard — Retained brick walls and repaired roof edges

Excavation and structural work within a historic brick courtyard — Below-grade work recorded before the courtyard was closed

01 / Concern: The board needed to retain the brick walls, arches, and familiar rooms while correcting water entry, structural weakness, and inaccessible circulation.
02 / Response: Opening-up surveys confirmed what the record drawings missed. Repair mockups and restrained structural insertions were reviewed against the original fabric before work continued.
03 / After handover: Original masonry remained visible, concealed work was documented for future care, and the building reopened without losing the character the community recognized.

03 / Client account

Dallas, Texas

Cultural gathering space

Courtyard architecture + drainage

Oak Park Cultural Courtyard

“The courtyard looked resolved on paper, but the hard part was below the surface. When field conditions changed, Kristofer was present. KMG coordinated the drainage, structure, stone, and planting without passing the problem from one consultant to another.”
Denise HollowayOwner's representative

Stone roofline and planted terrace at a cultural building — Stone edge, planting depth, and roof line at completion

Completed planted courtyard enclosed by pale stone walls — The completed court after drainage testing and planting

01 / Concern: Stone, planting soil, roof structure, drainage falls, and waterproofing occupied the same shallow construction zone with almost no tolerance for a late change.
02 / Response: KMG revised the slopes and edge details around verified site levels, then sequenced drainage testing before the stone and planting concealed the assembly.
03 / After handover: The finished court carries planting and public use while preserving drainage paths, inspection points, and practical access for long-term maintenance.

Nine more client voices

Different rooms. Different pressures.

01
“The same people who attended the first survey were still answering questions during construction.”
Arjun MehtaHomeownerAddition and renovation

02
“They explained the risk in plain language, then gave us more than one responsible way forward.”
Claire DonnellyFacilities directorExisting building

03
“KMG treated the budget as a design condition, not as a conversation to postpone.”
Samir HaddadProject executiveNew construction

04
“When the wall was opened and the existing framing differed from the record drawings, the response came that day.”
Elena RuizContractorAdaptive reuse

05
“Our first plan removed too much wall. Kristofer brought tracing paper to the kitchen table and showed us where the opening could move without changing the rooms we cared about.”
Marcus Reed and Naomi TanHomeownersBrownstone renovation

06
“The rain test gave us an answer nobody wanted, but KMG had the repair area marked and priced before the next storm.”
Owen MercerProperty managerFacade repair

07
“We could not repair everything at once. KMG separated the urgent structural work from the items we could plan into the next funding round.”
Daniel ParkNonprofit directorCommunity center

08
“We stopped receiving one answer from the architect and another from the engineer. The house came back to us as one set of decisions.”
Amara Brooks and Javier MoralesHomeownersNew family home

09
“At every site meeting, someone from KMG could point to the drawing, the field condition, and the decision that closed it.”
Rajiv MenonConstruction managerMulti-unit housing

See the work behind the notes

Start with a building, a constraint, or a question.

View projects Start a conversation